Cool. Hadn't seen that one. Yes, the bias is showing, but it's an interesting "bystander" perspective of the trial, and how lawyers can blat a lot...and/or say little doing it.
I was a little amused the reporter they complained the defense attorney asked questions to Rowling that had already been brought up. The defense was doing a cross-examination. They're only allowed to ask questions on subjects that were already brought up.
*still snickering at the pie chart the plaintiff wants put in the trial*
ETA: Trial Recap by the Leaky Cauldron. From what I understand (and I swear, I didn't know much about HP fandom before reading about this case), this site used to have a business/fandom relationship with the Lexicon (sorta the defendant), but now have parted ways partly (wholly?) because of this case, so obviously they're not completely objective either. But this report is more of a layman's play by play of the testimony. Like a *really* detailed con report.
no subject
I was a little amused the reporter they complained the defense attorney asked questions to Rowling that had already been brought up. The defense was doing a cross-examination. They're only allowed to ask questions on subjects that were already brought up.
*still snickering at the pie chart the plaintiff wants put in the trial*
ETA: Trial Recap by the Leaky Cauldron. From what I understand (and I swear, I didn't know much about HP fandom before reading about this case), this site used to have a business/fandom relationship with the Lexicon (sorta the defendant), but now have parted ways partly (wholly?) because of this case, so obviously they're not completely objective either. But this report is more of a layman's play by play of the testimony. Like a *really* detailed con report.