ext_3557: annerb icon with scenes of all team variations, my OTP (Jack grammar)
Aurora Novarum ([identity profile] aurora-novarum.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] smg01 2008-04-15 03:50 am (UTC)

Cool. Hadn't seen that one. Yes, the bias is showing, but it's an interesting "bystander" perspective of the trial, and how lawyers can blat a lot...and/or say little doing it.

I was a little amused the reporter they complained the defense attorney asked questions to Rowling that had already been brought up. The defense was doing a cross-examination. They're only allowed to ask questions on subjects that were already brought up.

*still snickering at the pie chart the plaintiff wants put in the trial*

ETA: Trial Recap by the Leaky Cauldron. From what I understand (and I swear, I didn't know much about HP fandom before reading about this case), this site used to have a business/fandom relationship with the Lexicon (sorta the defendant), but now have parted ways partly (wholly?) because of this case, so obviously they're not completely objective either. But this report is more of a layman's play by play of the testimony. Like a *really* detailed con report.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting