you all are just a bunch of enablers
Aug. 2nd, 2004 09:00 amFinally after all the Stargate talk of the last few weeks I've caved and started watching. I think I'm hooked.
Like I really needed that.
But it is nice to have a new-to-me show.
And if I can focus on the shallow things, Richard Dean Anderson is aging quite well I think.
Like I really needed that.
But it is nice to have a new-to-me show.
And if I can focus on the shallow things, Richard Dean Anderson is aging quite well I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 02:09 pm (UTC)But if I get sucked into this show, I will blame y'all.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 02:50 pm (UTC)it's really a good show. Really.
Plus, RDA is better looking now that he's older, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-03 06:36 am (UTC)I am not so sure....
Date: 2004-08-02 08:08 pm (UTC)see, there is this strong Canadian component to Stargate's production. In fact, the guy who played Daniel in the early seasons (he died/resurrected or something, right?) -- Michael Shanks -- is from a town 2 hours from my hometown. And as a result of all the Canadian money in the show it is ALWAYS. on. the two local stations (which are all we get with our fancy rabbit ears). And while I liked it at first -- quite a lot, in fact -- it has gotten old very very quickly. *shrug*
Re: I am not so sure....
Date: 2004-08-03 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 05:44 pm (UTC)On the other hand, they had the first 5 seasons there, so I think we did pretty well to come away with just one..
no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 02:57 pm (UTC)The show is addictive, I tell you. Too much purty. Plus cool evil aliens. And it is fun to get into a new thing. *g*
You know, I'm sure thanks to their relentless self-promotion, that Sci-Fi just launched a spin off, Atlantis, which is showing some promise. I'm happy because I'm in on this one from the beginning, so not playing catch up like I was with SG1.
And yeah, RDA without the mullet is a very good thing.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 03:34 pm (UTC)*sigh*
Date: 2004-08-02 04:44 pm (UTC)I irrationally blame SG-1 for contributing to Farscape's demise, and I'm fine with that. Also, the few times I have watched, I've managed to catch what everyone tells me are "just the WORST episodes" to watch first.
Also, also, I never got Bab5, either, so I'm used to the fast-standing aloneness. :)
Re: *sigh*
Date: 2004-08-02 05:39 pm (UTC)SG-1 is kewl.
Re: *sigh*
Date: 2004-08-02 06:12 pm (UTC)So is Farscape, except the insane way they released the show on DVD is kinda preventing me from being able to watch that one.
Re: *sigh*
Date: 2004-08-02 08:12 pm (UTC)indeed. amen. etc. I have a large number of Farscape crazy friends, and the eps I have seen, I have liked. But I do not have endless pockets, and therefore cannot afford the DVDs.
And I have not the cable at home, so I can't even tape it in syndication on Canada's Space network, which airs it every weekday morning....
Re: *sigh*
Date: 2004-08-02 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-02 08:49 pm (UTC)I suppose one can't have too many little tv crushes.